126 F. Supp. 2d 451 - Eubanks v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]hough the legislature passed this Statute to further its preference for birth over abortion[,] the pamphlets do not overtly trumpet that preference. They provide information from which a woman might naturally select the choice favored by the legislature.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 283 F. Supp. 3d 629 - EMW Women's Surgical Ctr., P.S.C. v. Beshear

2. “between those incidental effects [ e.g., slightly increased cost or time delay] of the statute which make the right to choose more inconvenient or costly and those direct effects which actually prevent women from obtaining an abortion,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Newman

3. “[i]f Kentucky's pamphlets and the resulting infringement on speech are legally indistinguishable from those presented in Casey , then Casey controls.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 283 F. Supp. 3d 629 - EMW Women's Surgical Ctr., P.S.C. v. Beshear