Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 F. Supp. 2d 532 - Beth B. v. Van Clay

126 F. Supp. 2d 532 - Beth B. v. Van Clay’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 2015
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1415

Relies on Honig v. Doe · School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Education · Drinker v. Colonial School District · Board of Education of Oak Park & River Forest High School District 200 v. Illinois State Board of Education · Board of Education v. Illinois State Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any party to an impartial due process hearing aggrieved by the final -written decision of the impartial due process hearing officer shall have the right to commence a civil action with respect to the issues presented in the impartial due process hearing. That civil action shall be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction within 120 days after a copy of the decision of the impartial due process hearing officer is mailed to the party as provided in subsection (h). The civil action authorized by this subsection shall not be exclusive of any rights or causes of action otherwise available. The commencement of a civil action under this subsection shall operate as a supersedeas.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.