¶1Defendant appeals from his conviction for the offense of failing to pay for agricultural products purchased on a cash' sale basis. Code Ann. § 5-9914.
¶2The evidence would authorize a finding that this was a cash sale. The court’s charge on the subject merely instructed the' jury that some reasonable delay between delivery and payment in order to compute the price would not preclude a finding of cash sale. See Troup v. State, 209 Ga. 9 (70 SE2d 470).
¶3The evidence would also authorize a finding that the offense was committed in Telfair County as defendant arranged and paid for shipment from the collection point there to his place- of business. Venue was therefore proper. Garmon v. State, 219 Ga. 575 (4) (134 SE2d 796).
¶4All other enumerations of error are without merit.
¶5Judgment affirmed.