126 Ga. App. 700 - Kohlmeyer & Co. v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Gruen Industries, Inc. v. Biller (1979), Lewis v. Hughes (1975)
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 119 Ga. App. 513 - Chandler v. Gately · Southwest Engineering Co., Inc. v. Martin Tractor Co. · Dorsey v. Clements · Horton v. Murden · Croker v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although Bowen further claimed that he was entitled to interest from March 20 rather than from the ‘due date,’ there is no requirement that defendant admit the entire terms of the contract as contended for by the plaintiff but only that he admit a contract of sale of a stated quantity of described securities at a defined or stated price. This is sufficient to take the parol contract out of the statute so that it can be proven and enforced as proven.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“signed” includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to authenticate a writing. UCC § 1-201 (39) (Code Ann. § 109A-1 — 201 (39)). The inclusion of authentication in the definition of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that a contract was made for sale of a stated quantity of described securities at a defined or stated price.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.