Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 Ill. App. 103

Wells v. Murphy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1906

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1906-04-10

Mechanic’s lien proceeding. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Bremtano, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1905. Statement by the Court.

Writ of error dismissed · Decided 1906-04-10

Me. Justice Baker

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The defendants in the cause, January 14,1905, when the decree was rendered which it is sought to review upon this writ of error, were Frederick L., Arthur B., Walter A. and Luda Wells, four of the children and heirs at law of Frederick C. Wells, deceased, who was the owner of the premises upon which a mechanic’s lien is sought to be establiskecl by this proceeding when the building in question was erected thereon; Albert E. Gf. Good ridge, the surviving husband of Clara A. W. Goodridge, a deceased ■ daughter of Frederick C. Wells, who died after the death of her father; E. Ware Kendall, the lessee of the premises in question, from Frederick C. Wells and who made the contract with petitioners to erect said building; Arthur B. Wells, the trustee, in a trust deed in the nature of a mortgage executed by Frederick C. Wells upon said premises; Mary Sullivan, the holder of the notes or a portion of the notes secured by said trust deed, and the unknown holders of the notes secured by said trust deed.

¶3The decree establishes a lien in favor of defendant in error, the survivor of the original petitioners; finds the amount due to him; orders that in default of the payment of such amount the premises be sold; finds the value of the premises at the time the contract for said building was made and the amount such value was enhanced by reason of such improvement; determines the proportions in which the funds arising from such sale shall be divided between defendant in error and the holders of the notes secured by said trust deed, and finds that E. Ware Kendall is liable to defendant in error personally, for the amount so found due to defendant in error, and directs that an execution issue against him for the deficiency, if any, in such amount remaining after the sale.

¶4The writ of error is not sued out by all of the defendants, nor even by all of the defendants who are heirs at law of the original defendant, Frederick O. Wells. It is sued out only by Arthur B. Wells, personally, and as trustee, Frederick L. Wells and Luda Wells.

¶5The defendants, their brother Walter A. Wells, Good-ridge, the husband of their deceased sister, Kendall, their father’s lessee, Mary E. Sullivan and the unknown holders of the notes secured by the trust deed to Arthur B. Wells, do not join in the writ of error. For this reason, upon the authority of Scott v. Great Western Coal Co., 220 111. 42, and cases there cited, the writ of error will be dismissed.

¶6Writ of error dismissed.

/126/illapp/103 · .json · Public domain