Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 KAN 479 - Putnam v. Putnam

Putnam v. Putnam’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
November 1966
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1966

13 state decisions

5019281930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City Township · Blair v. Blair · Huls ex rel. Bork v. Lumber · Potts v. West · Putnam v. Putnam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In an action to vacate a judgment for fraud of the successful party a petition fails to state a cause of action where it relies solely upon the ground that the judgment was obtained upon false or perjured testimony and shows that the issue to which the alleged false testimony relates was raised by the pleadings and was tried out upon a conflict of testimony, the truth or falsity of which was necessarily determined in the former action.” (Syl. S.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The fraud which will authorize a court to vacate a judgment in an action brought for that purpose under section 570 of the code of civil procedure must be extrinsic or collateral to the matter involved in the former action, and sufficient to justify the conclusion that but for such fraud the result would have been different.” (Syl. ¶ 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.