Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 KAN 9 - Schnatterly v. Eslinger

Schnatterly v. Eslinger’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1936
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on First National Bank v. Lyman · Newman v. Lake · Keirsey v. Board of Commissioners · State ex rel. Kellogg v. Board of Commissioners · State ex rel. Bradford v. Harwi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . in nearly all of them the diversion of the funds was to another specific fund, or purpose under a specific fund, and embraced no serious contention that the purpose was included within the fund itself.” (p. 10.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No tax shall be levied except in pursuance of a law, which shall distinctly state the object of the same; to which object only such tax shall be applied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.