Ansley v. Stuart

Decided May 9, 1910

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1910-05-09

King, Judge. Action by M. E. Ansley against C. D. Stuart. From a rule ordering money deposited with the clerk of court to be paid certain persons, W. J. Gex, the transferee of a judgment for plaintiff, appeals.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1973

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Judgment affirmed · Decided 1910-05-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Application for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

¶2Our attention has been called to the fact that the appellees did not answer the appeal, and therefore have no standing to demand damages for a frivolous appeal. Code Prac. art. 890. The point is well taken. Otherwise we find- no merit in the application for a rehearing.

¶3It is therefore ordered that our decree herein be amended, by striking out the award of damages for a frivolous appeal, and, as thus amended, is reaffirmed, and that the application for a rehearing be refused.