Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 Mass. 397

Arnold v. Nash

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1879-03-18

Tort for breaking and entering the plaintiff’s close, and removing the plaintiff’s goods therefrom, and for an assault.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1910

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1879-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1The only ruling excepted to is that, assuming, as matter of fact, that the defendant obtained peaceable entry and possession on Saturday, and, as matter of law, that previous notice was necessary, then, as matter of law, two days *399was a reasonable time for such notice; and the bill of exceptions states no facts having any tendency to show that the ruling, as applicable to the circumstances of this case, was erroneous. Pratt v. Farrar, 10 Allen, 519.

¶2Exceptions overruled.

/126/mass/397 · .json · Public domain