Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 Misc. 328

Rosenfield v. Heller

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1926-01-07

Decided 1926-01-07

Per Curiam.

¶1While ordinarily it is not the office of the court to inquire into the sufficiency of a defense where the motion is to vacate the examination of a party for the purpose of supporting it when, as here, the attempted defense is so palpably insufficient on its face that no evidence in support thereof could be adduced upon the trial, we feel warranted in ordering a vacation of the notice. Nowhere does the defense allege a single act done by plaintiffs to the actual injury of the defendant. The order appealed from is reversed and the notice for examination is vacated.

¶2Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

¶3All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Lydon, JJ.

/126/misc/328 · .json · Public domain