Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 Mont. 171 - State v. Gilbert

State v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1971
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1971

6 state decisions

20195219601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leon v. State · State v. Riggs · State v. McCarthy · State v. Willette · State v. Sieff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Receiver of stolen property. Every person who for his own gain or to prevent the owner from again possessing his own property buys or receives any personal property, knowing the same to have been stolen, is punishable- by imprisonment in the state prison not exceeding five (5) years or in a county jail not exceeding six (6) months; and it is presumptive evidence that such property was stolen if the same consists of jewelry, silver or plated ware or articles of personal ornaments, brass, bronze or copper fixtures, fittings or parts of machinery, or electrical supplies, or what is commonly termed junk, if purchased or received from a person under the age of twenty-one (21) years unless said property is sold by said minor at a fixed place of business carried on by said minor or his employer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We are committed to the doctrine that — `A defendant may not be convicted on conjectures, however shrewd, on suspicions, however justified, on probabilities, however strong, but only upon evidence which establishes guilt beyond reasonable doubt; that is, upon proof such as to logically compel the conviction that the charge is true'. [Citing cases]. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““A necessary and essential element of the crime of receiving stolen property is that of establishing beyond a' reasonable doubt that the stolen property be stolen by someone other than the defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.