Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 N.C. App. 312 - State v. Dick

126 N.C. App. 312 - State v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 142 N.C. App. 411 - State v. Grover (2001), 138 N.C. App. 252 - State v. McAllister (2000)

2 district · 65 state decisions

420199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 89 N.C. App. 212 - State v. Bailey · State v. Wallace · State v. Trent · State v. Lucas · 111 N.C. App. 359 - State v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is []well-settled that testimony based on the witness's examination of the child witness and expert knowledge concerning the abuse of children in general is not objectionable because it supports the credibility of the witness or states an opinion that abuse has occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'our appellate courts have consistently held that the testimony of an expert to the effect that a prosecuting witness is believable, credible, or telling the truth is inadmissible evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.