State v. Camargo’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2018
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Michigan v. Long · Arizona v. Manypenny · State v. Ball · Michigan v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“warrantless seizure and subsequent search of the defendant's vehicle were unreasonable under the State Constitution because no exigent circumstances existed to justify a warrantless search”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torres · State v. Torres“that the exigency exception [to the warrant requirement] typically applies to searches of automobiles stopped while in transit, because of their mobility and the likelihood that the occupants will be alerted to the police suspicion and will remove or destroy the contents of the automobile,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hen the automobile was parked behind the defendant's apartment in a private lot, the police had sufficient probable cause to obtain a search warrant for the defendant's automobile,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.