Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 N.J. Super. 401 - Collins v. Uniroyal

126 N.J. Super. 401 - Collins v. Uniroyal’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
5
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd. (1981), McDonald v. Mianecki (1979)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions

12019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc. · Courtois v. General Motors Corp. · 58 N.J. Super. 386 - Manning v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Consequential damages may be limited or excluded unless the limitation or exclusion is unconscionable. Limitations of consequential damages for injury to the person in case of consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable but limitation of damages where the loss is commercial is not.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the advertisement helped to explain the scope and intent of the 'road hazard' part of the warranty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he warranty ... was given to [the buyer] at the time he bought the tires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.