State v. Magby’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably State v. Coffin (1999), State v. Elliott (2001)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Salazar · Santillanes v. State · State v. Wilson · State v. Parish · Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La Farge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We stress that our holding on the negligent child abuse instruction tendered in this case is not applicable retroactively to other cases. As in Santillanes , our holding has only prospective application to cases in which a verdict has not been reached and those cases on direct review in which the issue was raised and preserved below.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“For you to find the defendant guilty of failure to appear as required by conditions of release ..., the state must prove to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of the crime: 1. _ (name of defendant) was released pending [trial] [an appeal] in a criminal action on the condition that _{name of defendant) appear as required by the court; 2. _ {name of defendant) failed to appear as required by the court; 3. The defendant’s failure to appear was willful, without sufficient justification or exeuse[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Elliott“For you to find that the Defendant acted recklessly in this case, you must find that he knew or should have known that his conduct created a substantial and foreseeable risk, that he disregarded that risk and that he was wholly indifferent to the consequences of his conduct and to the welfare and safety of others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mascarenas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.