State v. Munoz’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 68 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State v. Nieto (2000), State v. Gutierrez (2011)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 68 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Oregon v. Mathiason · California v. Beheler · Miller v. Fenton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the extent to which the defendant is confronted with evidence of guilt”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Munoz · State v. Snell“The test is objective: the actual subjective beliefs of the defendant and the interviewing officer on whether the defendant was free to leave are irrelevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Snell“determine[s] as a threshold matter of law that the prosecution proved voluntariness by a preponderance of the evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quinones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.