Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 N.M. 683 - State v. Herbstman

State v. Herbstman’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Barragan (2001), State v. Fairbanks (2003)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 52 state decisions

3601998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Rowell · Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp. · State v. Ogden · Fernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona · Quintana v. New Mexico Department of Corrections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] deferred sentence is entered with an entry of adjudication of guilt, but does not necessarily subject the defendant to criminal consequences”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a conditional discharge order is entered without entry of an adjudication of guilt,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.