Herrera v. Herrera’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson (1999), Ottino v. Ottino (2001)
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texaco, Inc. v. Ponsoldt · Zlotziver v. Zlotziver · Ruggles v. Ruggles · Paulos v. Janetakos · 233 Cal. App. 3d 1671 - Nicholson v. Barab
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his sensible provision represents legislative recognition of a policy common to the statute of frauds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gibson v. Arnold
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.