Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 N.M. 717 - Delta Automatic Systems, Inc. v. Bingham

Delta Automatic Systems, Inc. v. Bingham’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
3
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Elm Ridge Exploration Co. v. Engle (2013), In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation (2004)

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 38 state decisions

2201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · 118 Wash. 2d 753 - Allen v. State · Marchman v. NCNB Texas National Bank · Leyba v. Whitley · NCNB National Bank of North Carolina v. Tiller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Quintanas contend that Defendants owed them a special duty because Bing-ham drew up their wills and represented them in business matters apart from his representation of Delta. It is true that as their personal lawyers, Defendants owed the Quintanas various duties. But the Quintanas allege no harm suffered by them as a result of a breach of those duties. In representing Delta, Defen dants did not owe the Quintanas, as shareholders, any special duty above and beyond their duties to the corporation. This is so even though the Quinta-nas were the sole shareholders of Delta and Defendants knew that the Quinta-nas’ livelihood depended on Delta’s success. Our Supreme Court rejected similar claims in Marchman .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]his Court has no duty to search the record or research the law to `defend' in a civil case a party that fails to defend itself on an issue”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.