Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 N.M. 725 - Smith v. Cutler Repaving

Smith v. Cutler Repaving’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight) · Madrid v. St. Joseph Hospital · National Council on Compensation Insurance v. New Mexico State Corp. Commission · Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc. · Herman v. Miners' Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “medically stationary” as "no further material improvement would reasonably be expected from medical treatment, ór the passage of time.” Clarke v. SAIF Corp., 120 Or.App. 11 , 852 P.2d 208 (1993); New Mexico defines "maximum medical improvement” as “the date after which further recovery from or lasting improvement to an injury can no longer be reasonably anticipated based upon reasonable medical probability as determined by a health care provider.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonable medical probability of future recovery and lasting improvement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.