126 Ohio App. 3d 439 - State v. Crock’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4) In plain sight with the action open or the weapon stripped, or, if the firearm is of a type on which the action will not stay open or which cannot easily be stripped, in plain sight. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“{¶ 16} In that case, the State did not elicit testimony that an officer at the scene attempted to look into appellant's car to ascertain whether the weapon was in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it cannot be said that a police officer's failure to look would render an object to be out of `plain view.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.