126 Ohio App. 3d 557 - State v. Sargent’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2026
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. United States · State v. Combs · State v. Finnerty · State v. Gustafson · 36 Ohio App. 3d 147 - State v. Blevins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hyde's testimony indicates that appellant's statements consisting of threats to cut anyone that fucked with him and to cut Upton's head off were specifically directed toward Upton and occurred only a few months prior to Upton being found dead as a result of a stabbing. Appellant's statements were not too distant in time as to have no probative value because the statements reflected the type of conduct with which appellant was charged. Appellant's statements were also probative of whether the stabbing was accidental. Therefore, the trial court could have reasonably concluded that the statements were admissible pursuant to Evid. R. 404(B). {¶ 49} "The trial court's decision to admit the evidence was not arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that the [S]tate presented sufficient evidence . . . the Kentucky juvenile court relinquished its jurisdiction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Madden · State v. Davis“demeaning to the seriousness of the offense,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Madden · State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.