126 Ohio App. 3d 95 - State v. Lloyd’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
171 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 173 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably 184 Ohio App. 3d 675 - State v. Pilgrim (2009), 147 Ohio App. 3d 550 - State v. Hodge (2002)
171 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Beck v. State of Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · United States v. Gouveia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 173 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n a hearing on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court assumes the role of trier of fact and is in the best position to resolve questions of fact and evaluate the credibility of witnesses.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“our standard of review with respect to motions to suppress is whether the trial court's findings are supported by competent, credible evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'[i]n a hearing on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court assumes the role of trier of facts and is in the best position to resolve questions of fact and evaluate the credibility of witnesses.' " State v. Hopfer , 112 Ohio App.3d 521 , 679 N.E.2d 321 (2d Dist.1996), quoting State v. Venham , 96 Ohio App.3d 649 , 645 N.E.2d 831 (4th Dist.1994). "However, once we accept those facts as true, we must independently determine, as a matter of law and without deference to the trial court's conclusion, whether the trial court met the applicable legal standard.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.