Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 Ohio St. 39

183 N.E 865

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1932-12-21

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1989

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-12-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This matter coming on to be heard upon the demurrer of the relator, Joseph Cezkovsky, to the first and second defenses of the answer of the respondent was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon consideration whereof, said demurrer to the first defense is overruled because the same contains a general denial of matters not specifically admitted, thus tendering an issue; and the demurrer to the second defense is overruled for the reason that the answer pleads that the Industrial Commission was of opinion that the medical testimony offered by the applicant was not of such character as to justify final action, and that the Industrial Commission retained jurisdiction of the claim and is willing to consider any evidence which the applicant might wish to offer on this or any other phase of his case, and no final denial upon jurisdictional grounds of the right of the said Cezkovsky to participate in the state insurance fund has been found by the Industrial Commission.

¶2Leave is granted to relator to plead on or before January 14, 1933.

¶3Demurrer overruled.

*40

¶4MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.

¶5KINKADE, J., not participating.

/126/ohiost/39 · .json · Public domain