Herbring v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1968
2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Paul v. Virginia · Hooper v. People of State of California · Cheney Bros Co v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. People of the State of New York · La Tourette v. McMaster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall be unlawful for any fire insurance company doing business in the state of Oregon to write, place or cause tó be written or placed, any policy or contract for indemnity or insurance on property situated or located in the state of Oregon, except through or by the duly authorized agent or agents of such insurance company residing and doing business in this state, to' whom the premium on such insurance §hall be paid ... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Herbring v. Lee“a foreign corporation being required to comply with the statute, in order to be entitled to appoint agents and consummate its business in the state of Oregon, it follows . . . that in order for an agent to obtain a license to represent such a foreign corporation there must first be a compliance by the foreign corporation with the requirements of our state law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Herbring v. Lee“the rights of one applying for a license to act as agent for such insurance company are contingent upon the compliance of the company with conditions precedent to its right to appoint such an agent”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Herbring v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.