Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 P.3d 249 - People v. Patnode

People v. Patnode’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Whren v. United States · Rhode Island v. Innis · New York v. Belton · Solem v. Helm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall apply to acts committed on or after”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When conducting an abbreviated proportionality review under the habitual criminal statute, a reviewing court must seru-tinize the offenses in question to determine 'whether in combination they are so lacking in gravity or seriousness' so as to suggest that the sentence is grossly disproportionate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Here, the General Assembly reduced the [driving] offense from a felony to a misdemeanor, In our view, this indicates the General Assembly's conclusion that the offense is not grave and serious.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.