Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 SO2D 289 - Register v. Redding

Register v. Redding’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2007

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

7019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 81 So. 2d 635 - Palmer v. RS Evans, Jacksonville, Inc. · Stills v. Weil-Maas, Inc. · 113 So. 2d 771 - Cox Motor Company v. Faber · Barnett v. Butler · 117 So. 2d 11 - Hicks v. Land

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The prime question presented for decision is whether the evidence which was before the court when he granted summary judgment reveals without dispute that a bona fide sale of the vehicle in question was made by defendant to Leilich at any time prior to the accident. Whether a sale was actually consummated is a question of law to be determined from the facts in evidence. The mere assertion by defendant that he sold the vehicle to Leilich, and Leilich’s assertion that he purchased the vehicle, are mere conclusions of law and of no probative effect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The mere fact that the evidence concerning the intent of the parties is uncontroverted does not necessarily mean that there is no genuine issue as to this material fact, if the uncontradicted evidence is lawfully susceptible of two or more conflicting inferences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.