Riley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 711 So. 2d 450 - Rushing v. State · 724 So. 2d 901 - Ragin v. State · 72 So. 3d 1056 - Knight v. State · McBride v. State · 39 So. 3d 943 - Catchings v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(5) Voice Identification. Identification of a voice, whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording, by opinion based upon hearing the voice at any time under circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker. (6) Telephone Conversations. Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time by the telephone company to a particular person or business, if (A) in the case of a person, circumstances, including self-identification, show the person answering to be the one called .... (9) Process or System. Evidence describing a process or system used to produce a result and showing that the process or system produces an accurate result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If after viewing all credible evidence in the light “most favorable to the State, the evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such -circumstances that every element of the offense existed,” then the evidence will be deemed legally sufficient and the verdict .will be upheld.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is through the testimony of a witness with knowledge 'that [an item] is what it is claimed to be.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.