Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ring v. Arizona · Tison v. Arizona · Porter v. McCollum · 878 So. 2d 1236 - Baker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" Strickland places the burden on the defendant, not the State, to show a 'reasonable probability' that the result would have been different." Wong v. Belmontes , 558 U.S. 15 [ 130 S.Ct. 383 , 175 L.Ed.2d 328 ] (2009) (quoting Strickland , 466 U.S. at 694 [ 104 S.Ct. 2052 ] ). Strickland does not "require a defendant to show 'that counsel's deficient conduct more likely than not altered the outcome' of his penalty proceeding, but rather that he establish 'a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in [that] outcome.' " Porter v. McCollum , 558 U.S. 30 [ 130 S.Ct. 447 , 175 L.Ed.2d 398 ] (2009) (quoting Strickland , 466 U.S. at 693-94 [ 104 S.Ct. 2052 ] ). This Court employs a mixed standard of review, deferring to the postconviction court's factual findings that are supported by competent, substantial evidence, but reviewing legal conclusions de novo.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.