¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant is not entitled to presentence jail *1171credit for time spent on house arrest. Licata v. State, 788 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
¶2Affirmed.
126 So. 3d 1170
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 8, 2012
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-08-08
Relies on 788 So. 2d 1063 - Licata v. State
Decided 2012-08-08
¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant is not entitled to presentence jail *1171credit for time spent on house arrest. Licata v. State, 788 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
¶2Affirmed.