Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 So. 3d 1170

Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-08-08

Relies on 788 So. 2d 1063 - Licata v. State

Decided 2012-08-08

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant is not entitled to presentence jail *1171credit for time spent on house arrest. Licata v. State, 788 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

¶2Affirmed.

POLEN, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
/126/so3d/1170 · .json · Public domain