Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 So. 3d 266

Bory v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 2010

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-09-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2018

2 state decisions

Relies on Schuty v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-09-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Gilberto Bory appeals the denial of his motion, which among other things, requested to commence speedy trial. Because this is not an appealable order, we treat the notice of appeal and initial brief as a petition for writ of prohibition, and deny the petition. See Fla. R.Crim. P. Rule 3.191(e) (requiring that a defendant be within state jurisdiction before he or she may demand speedy trial); Schuty v. State, 281 So.2d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973) (treating appeal from denial of discharge on speedy trial grounds as writ of prohibition).

/126/so3d/266 · .json · Public domain