¶1We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion without prejudice for her to file a facially sufficient motion if she can do so in good faith. Within sixty (60) days of the mandate for this case, appellant may file an amended motion in the trial court which complies with the pleading requirements set forth in Cano v. State, 112 So.3d 646, 648 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
126 So. 3d 445
Herrera v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 13, 2013
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-11-13
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2017
3 state decisions
Relies on Cano v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-11-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →