Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 So. 3d 869 - Pitre v. Bessette Development Corp.

126 So. 3d 869 - Pitre v. Bessette Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 646 So. 2d 859 - Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc. · Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu · 663 So. 2d 393 - Sinegal v. Able Glass Co., Inc. · In re Pullias · 664 So. 2d 810 - Miller v. Gaspard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following: lfi(l) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (2)the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the partieu- . lar employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; (4) the amount- involved and the results obtained; (5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances; (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; (7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and (8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.