Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 So. 3d 877 - Thomas v. State

126 So. 3d 877 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State · Love v. State · Spears v. State · Kelly v. State · May v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of knives. Id. at 879 . Thus, the Court found that the failure to specify the type of knife Thomas was in possession of amounted to a failure to charge Thomas with an essential element of the crime. Id. at 880 . ¶ 11. Under Section 97-3-7(1)(a), the Legislature criminalized simple assault against any person. Under Sections 97-3-7(1)(b) and (14), the Legislature specified that attacking certain specified categories of persons was an aggravating circumstance that was punishable by a greater sentence. Among those categories of persons designated by the Legislature is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “do not constitute [ ] an offense within the terms and meaning of the law or laws on which the accusation is based ... the indictment is insufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “An indictment which fails to allege all essential elements of a crime runs afoul of our constitutions and is void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.