Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

126 Tex. Crim. 229

70 S.W.2d 997

Arp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 3, 1934

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1934-01-03

<p>The opinion states the case.</p>

Relies on 117 Tex. Crim. 217 - Hudgins v. State

Decided 1934-01-03

¶1The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

¶2It is recited in the transcript that appellant entered into recognizance after notice of appeal was given. The recognizance is not brought forward in the transcript. When the accused is enlarged, this court is without jurisdiction in the absence of a proper recognizance or appeal bond. Hudgins v. State,36 S.W.2d 488.

¶3The appeal is dismissed.

¶4Dismissed

¶5The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

¶6

ON REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL.

/126/texcrim/229 · .json · Public domain