¶1 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
¶2 Appellant urges error on our part in reforming his sentence, — which had been by the trial court erroneously entered at two years, — so as to make same state the penalty as one year. We reformed the sentence to correspond with the verdict. Appellant urges error on our part in so doing. In felony cases tried by juries alone, under the procedure in this State, the power to fix the punishment is exclusively in the hands of the jury. If the sentence pronounced does not correspond with the punishment so fixed by the jury, this court on appeal has power to reform it and make it correspond. Art. 847, C. C. P.; Holden v. State, 98 Texas Crim. Rep., 592; Laudermilk v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 427; Smiddy v. State, 101 Texas Crim. Rep., 138; Hart v. State, *616101 Texas Crim. Rep., 514; Thurman v. State, 102 Texas Crim. Rep., 76; Williams v. State, 119 Texas Crim. Rep., 345.
¶3 The motion for rehearing is overruled.
¶4 Overruled.