State v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently February 1995 · most notably State v. Bacon (1995), State v. Baldwin (1981)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Rabinowitz · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Palko v. State of Connecticut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here several persons combine under a common understanding and with a common purpose to do an illegal act, every one is criminally responsible for the acts of each and all who participate with him in the execution of the unlawful design.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Ballou · State v. Gilman“forcibly or secretly confines or imprisons another person within this state against his will, or forcibly carries or sends such person out of the state, or forcibly seizes or confines or inveigles or kidnaps another person with intent to cause him to be secretly confined or imprisoned in this state against his will, or to cause him to be sent out of this state against his will, or in any way held to service against his will, shall be imprisoned not more than twenty-five years or fined not more than $10,000.00, or both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. McLaren“The test of due process as expressed in decisions under the Fourteenth Amendment has been one reviewing the substantive effect of the state’s implementation of various civil rights. Variations in procedure will not constitute a violation of the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution, as applied to the several states. Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 104 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.