Volume 126 — Washington Reports

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Holden, J., entered May 8, 1922, in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for specific performance, tried to the court.</p>

<p>Receivers (29) — Appointment—Collateral Attack. In an action by a receiver, his appointment cannot be collaterally attacked on the ground of want of prior notice, and that he was disqualified as having been attorney for the judgment creditors, since those questions could be raised only on appeal.</p> <p>Receivers (14)- — Appointment—Qualifications—Attorneys. An attorney for judgment creditors is not disqualified to act as receiver where he was not an attorney for the creditor in the case in which the appointment was made.</p>

<p>Malicious Pbosecution (11) — Pleading—Complaint—Tebmination of Action. A complaint in an action for a malicious prosecution of an insanity charge does not state a cause of action where it fails to allege want of probable cause and alleges that in the proceeding the plaintiff was adjudged to be insane.</p> <p>Same (11) — Complaint—Jubisdiction. In such a case, the fact that it is alleged that the court was without jurisdiction, does not cure the fact that plaintiff was adjudged insane.</p> <p>Pleading (95) — Demueeeb—Admissions by Demubbeb. A demurrer to a complaint alleging that the court was without jurisdiction only admits facts well pleaded, and want of jurisdiction must be shown by facts and not by a mere conclusion.</p>

, entered October 6, 1922, upon appeal from the department of labor and industries, disallowing a claim for compensation.

, entered October 6, 1922, upon appeal from the department of labor and industries, disallowing a claim for compensation.

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Grimshaw, J., entered July 11, 1922, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.</p>

<p>Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Benton county, Truax, J., entered November 1, 1922, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.</p>

, entered December 22, 1922, in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action on contract.

<p>Proceedings filed in the supreme court April 17, 1923, for the disbarment of an attorney, upon the findings of the state board of law examiners against the accused.</p>