126 Wash. 2d 283 - State v. Hobble’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably State v. Brown (1997), State v. Manussier (1996)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kastigar v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · Bloom v. Illinois · Ullmann v. United States · Terry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a sanction imposed for the purpose of coercing performance when the contempt consists of the omission or refusal to perform an act that is yet in the person's power to perform.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“a sanction imposed to punish a past contempt of court for the purpose of upholding the authority of the court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“In construing [article I,] section 21, this court has said that it preserves the right as it existed at common law in the territory at the time of its adoption.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Manussier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.