Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 126 W. Va. 280 - State v. Bunner

126 W. Va. 280 - State v. Bunner’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably 153 W. Va. 636 - State Ex Rel. West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. Copenhaver (1969), 146 W. Va. 22 - Farley v. Graney (1960)

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

1601943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yates v. Milwaukee · Ex Parte Daniels · 121 W. Va. 319 - Chapman v. Huntington, West Virginia, Housing Authority · 126 W. Va. 21 - Brackman's, Inc. v. City of Huntington · People ex rel. Barmore v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Ajnother uniformly recognized exception to the general rule, by which the legislature is much less restricted [is] when its delegation of legislative authority is to an administrative body created for the care of public health.... [W]here the subject matter of the administrative authority is public health, the power is uniformly held not to originate in the Constitution, but from “the police power” .... Courts generally [ ] take the position that regulations and rules duly promulgated by a legally constituted board of health will be construed as valid wherever possible, if reasonably calculated to achieve the result intended by the legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.