Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 AD 604 - Wilber v. Gillespie

Wilber v. Gillespie’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1965
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Holcomb v. . Holcomb · Clift v. . Moses · Hoag v. . Wright · In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Eysaman · Cary v. . White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The precise evidence excluded in the case at bar was evidence of a transaction between the plaintiff and the decedent, by which the plaintiff derived impressions or information from the conduct of the decedent. The conduct was his writing his name in her presence a sufficient number of times to produce in her mind an impression or information from which, upon being shown another piece of paper, she would be qualified to testify that in her opinion it was the same handwriting with which she had familiarized herself in a transaction with him. In my opinion the evidence was properly excluded." ( 112 N.Y.S. at 25 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.