Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 ALA 254 - Crowder v. Red Mountain Mining Co.

Crowder v. Red Mountain Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2012

15 state decisions

401899190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Nesbit v. Independent District of Riverside · Davis v. Brown · Gunzberg v. Miller · Strauss v. Meertief

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judgment in the former suit being by default, no contest was had, and consequently no issues were litigated. This being true, the judgment pleaded could not operate as a bar or as an estoppel in the second suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.