State v. Gunnison’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 district · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse (1997), Mammo v. State (1983)
1 federal appellate · 8 district · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Aaron v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Thompson v. United States · United States v. William Rabinowich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a fraudulent practice and unlawful for a person, in connection with a transaction or transactions within or from this state involving an offer to sell or buy securities, or a sale or purchase of securities, including securities exempted under § 44-1843 or 44-1843.01 and including transactions exempted under § 44-1844, directly or indirectly to do any of the following: 1. Employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud. 2. Make any untrue statement of material fact, or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 3. Engage in any transaction, practice or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is a fraudulent practice and unlawful for a person, in connection with a transaction or transactions within or from this state involving an offer to sell or buy securities, or a sale or purchase of securities ... [to] directly or indirectly ... [e]ngage in any transaction, practice or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grand v. Nacchio
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.