McFarlin v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
98 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Ontiveros v. Borak (1983), Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland (1984)
98 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. · E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. Noland · Tucker v. Collar · Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc. · Vigil v. Pine, Jr.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]s designed, in part at least, to protect the other from the hazard of being harmed by the intervening force, or by the effect of the intervening force operating on the condition created by the negligent conduct, then that hazard is within the duty, and the intervening force is not a superseding cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Delozier v. Evans · Rourk v. State“It is sufficient if the jury could have found on the evidence that a reasonable person would have foreseen that the condition or presence of [the assailant] on the premises posed a threat of physical harm to the patrons or employees of the bar and would have taken action to prevent such harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sucanick v. Clayton“[0]ne who operates a bar where the public is invited while not an insurer of the safety of his patrons, owes the duty to his patrons to exercise reasonable care and vigilance to protect them from reasonably foreseeable injury, mistreatment or annoyance at the hands of other patrons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sucanick v. Clayton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.