Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 Ariz. 554 - State v. Dixon

State v. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
6
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Pool v. Superior Court (1984), State v. Poland (1985)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 72 state decisions

460200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Barnes v. United States · United States v. Gainey · Hem v. United States · United States v. Oates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he varying states of mind set forth, in paragraph 1 the intent to deprive and in paragraph 5 knowing or having reason to know that the property was stolen, have a readily perceivable connection, are consistent with and not repugnant to each other, and clearly may inhere in the same transaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Pool v. Superior Court
  2. “(1) The title of the act; (2) Whether there is a readily perceivable connection between the various acts set forth; (3) Whether the acts are consistent with and not repugnant to each other; (4) Whether the acts may inhere in the same transaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Forrester
  3. “defines a specific crime and provides ways in which the crime may be committed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Carter

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.