¶1 I concur in the judgment on the first ground discussed by Justice Temple. The people of the state being the owner of its wild game, it may be conceded that the state legislature could annex any condition it chose to the privilege of taking it, hut a county ordinance forbidding all persons, under penalty, to transport game lawfully taken to the place where they desire to use or dispose of it is violative of the right of private property, as defined and regulated by general law, and necessarily invalid.
127 Cal. 101
59 P 315
Ex Parte Knapp
Decided December 5, 1899
California Supreme Court · decided 1899-12-05
HABEAS CORPUS in the Supreme Court to review the validity of a conviction in the Justice’s Court for violation of an ordinance of Stanislaus County. D. L. Smith, Justice of the. Peace. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1918
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1899-12-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →