127 Cal. App. 484 - People v. Hand’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Tijani v. Holder (2010), 114 Cal. App. 2d 680 - People v. Frankfort (1952)
8 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Wieger · 24 Cal. App. 781 - People v. Bowman · 69 Cal. App. 524 - People v. Pearson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he fraudulent intent contemplated by the statute is the intent by the use of false representations to induce another to part with his property when otherwise he would not have done so ... therefore, when the property is obtained under such circumstances, neither the promise to repay, the intention at the time to make the aggrieved party whole, nor repayment, will relieve the false and fraudulent act in obtaining the property of its criminality.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Tijani v. Holder · Tijani v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.