Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 Cal. App. 2d 607 - Williams v. Smith

127 Cal. App. 2d 607 - Williams v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1961
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mox Incorporated v. Woods · Estrada v. Alvarez · City of Alturas v. Gloster · 52 Cal. App. 2d 550 - Clanton v. Clanton · King v. Los Angeles County Fair Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§ 1691. Rescission how effected. Rescission, when not effected by consent, can be accomplished only by the use, on the part of the party rescinding, of reasonable diligence to comply with the following rules: “1. He must rescind promptly, upon discovering the facts which entitled him to rescind, if he is free from duress, menace, undue influence, or disability, and is aware of his right to rescind; and, “2. He must restore to the other party everything of value which he has received from him under the contract; or must offer to restore the same, upon condition that such party shall do likewise, unless the latter is unable or positively refuses to do so. [Enacted 1872].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.