Sacks v. Kupferle’s Empirical Analysis
127 F. 569 · 1904
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 1906
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Washburn Moen Manuf'G Co v. Beat 'Em All Barbed-Wire Co · Deering v. Winona Harvester Works · Smith Griggs Manuf'G Co v. Sprague · Lovejoy v. Murray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a suit for infringement against a dealer in the alleged infringing article was defended by the manufacturer of such article at his own cost, and on appeal it was adjudged that complainant was not the original inventor, and that his patent was void, such adjudication is a bar to a subsequent suit directly against the manufacturer on the same patent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.