Gannert v. Rupert’s Empirical Analysis
127 F. 962 · 1904
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 1962 · most notably Howe Scale Company of 1886 v. Wyckoff Seamans Benedict (1905), Best & Co. v. Miller (1948)
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gannett v. Ruppert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘‘It is of no moment that the proof fails to show deception, confusion, or injury to any marked extent. Such proof is unnecessary where infringement of a valid trade-mark is clearly established.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.